AMARRA SOFTWARE VS BITPERFECT PLUS

With the two trials of the previous versions of Amarra, I felt the same with you that dynamism is somewhat lost with Dirac iRC.

AMARRA SOFTWARE VS BITPERFECT PLUS

I have licenses for Pure Music, Audirvana Plus other than Amarra and Amarra provides the best sound quality. If you haven't tried Amarra, I would recommend you try it. For superior quality playback, Amarra, Pure Music, Audirvana, and BitPerfect are just some of the programs available that yield far better sound than iTunes. Even without Dirac iRC, the sound of Amarra is very good. I think the good results of Amarra Symphony comes mainly from Amarra part rather than Dirac part. But you can check that easily by using different target curves. If I use the jRiver EQ to get a nearly flat response the sound is thin and sterile. From an audiophiles perspective, Apple s iTunes is great in that it can provide a bit-perfect digital datastream - and if youre concerned about sound. SAM is already giving me the phase correction, so I'm not missing that. I'm using REW to measure my system response and only reduce the peaks where I have room resonances with very narrow filters. Dirac is reducing the level by 8db which is somehow hearable as reduced dynamics. It helps to sort out room problems, but I can achive the same with the jRiver EQ. Built-in digital EQ is a bonus if you are into that. The downside is you need a more powerful computer than typical and it is more complex to use than JRiver or similar. I tried it 4 times and always came to the same conclusion. HQ Player is the obvious consensus answer according to the online comments of the most enthusiastic computer audiophile crowd. (1, 13:34)Vivialet Wrote: not really.I have decided to not use Dirac.

Amarra software vs bitperfect